Underlying | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
Revenue | 229.6 | 251.2 | 415.0 |
EBITDA | 39.1 | 47.4 | 65.0 |
NPAT | 11.9 | 17.7 | 25.0 |
Shares on issue | 126.60 | 127.34 | 151.10 |
EPS | 9.4 | 13.9 | 16.5 |
DPS | 6.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 |
Dividend yield | 4.7% | ||
Market cap'n | 256.9 | ||
Share price | 1.70 | ||
P/E | 10.3 |
They have delivered to the letter on their promises when they acquired Westnet. At the time IIN was tracking along with EBITDA of $46m and NPAT of $15.2m, Westnet added EBITDA of $12.0 and NPAT of $7.0, and they forecast synergies $6.8m - and voila - combined EBITDA of $64.8m. You can't ask for more than that - transparency and ability to deliver rolled into one, which for my book adds greatly to the all-too-important the management credibility quotient.
So where should their share price be trading. Let's take a quick look at some EBITDA multiples:
Valuation based on FY09 forecasts | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Remembering that IIN acquired Westnet at a EBITDA multiple of 4.3x including synergies (and 6.8x excluding synergies), then the very low end of a valuation range would imply a share price around $1.69 (using this same 4.3x).
Now I know we are battling through a global meltdown of epic proportions, but to me these numbers look pretty compelling. In summary,
- IIN is growing it's business in what was a mature and stable market, because technology has unleashed opportunities that the incumbents are loath to embrace. Why else is Telstra trading on a dividend yield of 9% and P/E under 10? I'd back IIN to continue to grow market share (even without further acquisitions).
- The core business is more of a 'must have' than a discretionary spend for its client. In fact as the disruptor, IIN's core service offering undercuts the incumbents with a cost saving proposition in a time when consumers are more focussed on saving money.
- IIN is well managed by a team aligned with shareholders
- IIN has a debt to equity ratio under 20% and free cashflow that more than covers its capex requirements
No comments:
Post a Comment